Mulligan wrote:I listened to the first recording on the News site, and Courser seems awfully concerned about what evidence some enemy might have and how far back said evidence goes. There has to be a sex tape, no?
A few months back it was rumored
that her husband busted in on them together in the Radission downtown. There was rumored
that a police report might exist.
Courser: I need to, if possible, inoculate the herd against gutter politics that are coming. Unless they have something really awful, which I do not know about, okay.
Graham: God, this is really awful.
Courser: What's that?
Graham: You and Cindy. I mean how much more awful could you get? I mean that shit you came up with is pretty awful. But like ...
. . .
Graham: Probably all go away.
Courser: I don't know, I don't know what they have.
Graham: Well you've got to assume they have everything.
Courser: How far back?
Graham: It doesn't matter how far back, Cindy's enough. It doesn't matter if there are a hundred other women. Cindy's the woman, the state rep, the cohort, the conservative, the christian. ... It doesn't really matter if they have anything going further back.
Courser: So we have to assume what? They have video?
Graham: You should assume the worst I guess. I assume getting video would be hard, but nothing's impossible with money, resources and plenty of time. ... They've got to have video or something -- video, pictures, audio, eyewitness statements. I don't know.
Courser: That would be hard.
Graham: I was only half being sarcastic.
Courser: I'm just saying it would be hard, but not impossible.
Graham: Tooo, have an eyewitness statement or the rest of those things?
Courser: I don't know how it goes. I assume there is video.
Graham: Then this isn't going to work.
Courser: It won't work but it will on the front end unless it's that.
Dude has some skeletons he's worried about.
I used to be with it, but then they changed what 'it' was. Now, what I'm with isn't 'it,' and what's 'it' seems weird and scary.