D-Day wrote:Does anyone else think it's dumb that the NCAA covers up the home floors in the tourney?
After giving it some thought – I kind of like it. It's good branding, a consistent look that reinforces the product.
D-Day wrote:Does anyone else think it's dumb that the NCAA covers up the home floors in the tourney?
Doctor Detroit wrote:D-Day wrote:Does anyone else think it's dumb that the NCAA covers up the home floors in the tourney?
After giving it some thought – I kind of like it. It's good branding, a consistent look that reinforces the product.
Roquefort Robert wrote:Doctor Detroit wrote:D-Day wrote:Does anyone else think it's dumb that the NCAA covers up the home floors in the tourney?
After giving it some thought – I kind of like it. It's good branding, a consistent look that reinforces the product.
DD=FUIGB?
Doctor Detroit wrote:Roquefort Robert wrote:Doctor Detroit wrote:D-Day wrote:Does anyone else think it's dumb that the NCAA covers up the home floors in the tourney?
After giving it some thought – I kind of like it. It's good branding, a consistent look that reinforces the product.
DD=FUIGB?
Seriously? I said that in two sentences, not two pages.
Roquefort Robert wrote:Doctor Detroit wrote:Roquefort Robert wrote:Doctor Detroit wrote:D-Day wrote:Does anyone else think it's dumb that the NCAA covers up the home floors in the tourney?
After giving it some thought – I kind of like it. It's good branding, a consistent look that reinforces the product.
DD=FUIGB?
Seriously? I said that in two sentences, not two pages.
DD=FUIGB Lite?
Doctor Detroit wrote:Roquefort Robert wrote:Doctor Detroit wrote:Roquefort Robert wrote:Doctor Detroit wrote:D-Day wrote:Does anyone else think it's dumb that the NCAA covers up the home floors in the tourney?
After giving it some thought – I kind of like it. It's good branding, a consistent look that reinforces the product.
DD=FUIGB?
Seriously? I said that in two sentences, not two pages.
DD=FUIGB Lite?
We're two sides of the same coin, but I'm the fun side.
The Suburban Avenger wrote:Sparty's going to have to play better than that to beat Louisville. I really think the winner of that game goes to the Final Four.
The Suburban Avenger wrote:U of D got the worst possible draw and will get murderized by Kansas.
Michigan has a great shot at the sweet sixteen, at which point it will be murderized by North Carolina.
Sparty got a No. 1 seed, but also got a horrible draw. If this team makes the Final Four, I'll eat my hat.
And the NCAA royally fucked several mid-majors by making them play each other early in the tournament.
Random thoughts: Is North Carolina really the second-best team in the country? Kansas or Mizzou deserved a No. 1 seed more, IMHO ... Duke does not deserve a No. 2 seed ... Murray State is better than a No. 6 seed ... Take it to the bank: Kentucky beats Kansas for the national title. Ohio State and Mizzou also make the Final Four.
Ansel Rakestraw wrote:The Suburban Avenger wrote:U of D got the worst possible draw and will get murderized by Kansas.
Michigan has a great shot at the sweet sixteen, at which point it will be murderized by North Carolina.
Sparty got a No. 1 seed, but also got a horrible draw. If this team makes the Final Four, I'll eat my hat.
And the NCAA royally fucked several mid-majors by making them play each other early in the tournament.
Random thoughts: Is North Carolina really the second-best team in the country? Kansas or Mizzou deserved a No. 1 seed more, IMHO ... Duke does not deserve a No. 2 seed ... Murray State is better than a No. 6 seed ... Take it to the bank: Kentucky beats Kansas for the national title. Ohio State and Mizzou also make the Final Four.
I hate you. Why did I take your advice on for that portion of my bracket?
Heywood McCrakin wrote:Ansel Rakestraw wrote:The Suburban Avenger wrote:U of D got the worst possible draw and will get murderized by Kansas.
Michigan has a great shot at the sweet sixteen, at which point it will be murderized by North Carolina.
Sparty got a No. 1 seed, but also got a horrible draw. If this team makes the Final Four, I'll eat my hat.
And the NCAA royally fucked several mid-majors by making them play each other early in the tournament.
Random thoughts: Is North Carolina really the second-best team in the country? Kansas or Mizzou deserved a No. 1 seed more, IMHO ... Duke does not deserve a No. 2 seed ... Murray State is better than a No. 6 seed ... Take it to the bank: Kentucky beats Kansas for the national title. Ohio State and Mizzou also make the Final Four.
I hate you. Why did I take your advice on for that portion of my bracket?
1. U of D got beatten. I love little boys. The younger the better!
2. Michigan great shot at sweet 16 -2 (they didn't even come close)
3. Sparty got horrible draw, louisville was better than advertised. I love little boys. The younger the better!
4. Kansas deserved higher seed than NC.... +/- not answered yet.
5. Mizzou deserved higher than NC.... -2
6. Duke doesn't deserve #2 seed. I love little boys. The younger the better!.5
7. Ohio State in final 4 I love little boys. The younger the better!
8. Mizzou in final 4 -1
9 KY and KA for nat title...remains to be seen.
-.5 so far....
Roquefort Robert wrote:Heywood McCrakin wrote:Ansel Rakestraw wrote:The Suburban Avenger wrote:U of D got the worst possible draw and will get murderized by Kansas.
Michigan has a great shot at the sweet sixteen, at which point it will be murderized by North Carolina.
Sparty got a No. 1 seed, but also got a horrible draw. If this team makes the Final Four, I'll eat my hat.
And the NCAA royally fucked several mid-majors by making them play each other early in the tournament.
Random thoughts: Is North Carolina really the second-best team in the country? Kansas or Mizzou deserved a No. 1 seed more, IMHO ... Duke does not deserve a No. 2 seed ... Murray State is better than a No. 6 seed ... Take it to the bank: Kentucky beats Kansas for the national title. Ohio State and Mizzou also make the Final Four.
I hate you. Why did I take your advice on for that portion of my bracket?
1. U of D got beatten. I love little boys. The younger the better!
2. Michigan great shot at sweet 16 -2 (they didn't even come close)
3. Sparty got horrible draw, louisville was better than advertised. I love little boys. The younger the better!
4. Kansas deserved higher seed than NC.... +/- not answered yet.
5. Mizzou deserved higher than NC.... -2
6. Duke doesn't deserve #2 seed. I love little boys. The younger the better!.5
7. Ohio State in final 4 I love little boys. The younger the better!
8. Mizzou in final 4 -1
9 KY and KA for nat title...remains to be seen.
-.5 so far....
You should be on some type of predator list.
Ansel Rakestraw wrote:"Blind squirrel finds a nut" theory + a handful of blind emotional picks + a large group of disinterested / slow witted coworkers as competitors = Ansel leading the office pool with a very good shot at victory.
That's going to piss off the five people in the office that take it seriously.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests