hotfudgedetroit.com

Roquefort Robert wrote:

Mad Max wrote:

How Many Five Year Olds Can You Realistically Take In A Fight?

http://www.buzzfeed.com/daves4/how-many-five-year-olds-can-you-take-in-a-fight

I got 31 and while even the website seemed impressed, I still think I can take more.

I got 37. You should be embarrassed I beat you.

ldodger wrote:

Roquefort Robert wrote:

Mad Max wrote:

How Many Five Year Olds Can You Realistically Take In A Fight?

http://www.buzzfeed.com/daves4/how-many-five-year-olds-can-you-take-in-a-fight

I got 31 and while even the website seemed impressed, I still think I can take more.

I got 37. You should be embarrassed I beat you.

I got 37, too........31? Man, I don't know.....

D-Day wrote:

ldodger wrote:

Roquefort Robert wrote:

Mad Max wrote:

How Many Five Year Olds Can You Realistically Take In A Fight?

http://www.buzzfeed.com/daves4/how-many-five-year-olds-can-you-take-in-a-fight

I got 31 and while even the website seemed impressed, I still think I can take more.

I got 37. You should be embarrassed I beat you.

I got 37, too........31? Man, I don't know.....

That's site is bullshit. I retook it and still only got 37.

Roquefort Robert wrote:

D-Day wrote:

ldodger wrote:

Roquefort Robert wrote:

Mad Max wrote:

How Many Five Year Olds Can You Realistically Take In A Fight?

http://www.buzzfeed.com/daves4/how-many-five-year-olds-can-you-take-in-a-fight

I got 31 and while even the website seemed impressed, I still think I can take more.

I got 37. You should be embarrassed I beat you.

I got 37, too........31? Man, I don't know.....

That's site is bullshit. I retook it and still only got 37.

And I've still got 49. You're ALL pansies!!

Our co-op is a beast, she got 53!!!

I didn't take the quiz but I it or a similar quiz a whike ago and found it wanting. Results may work for kindergarten-age zombies, but the psychological factor would at least double or triple the amount of normal kids that anyone could take.

The Beav wrote:http://www.howmanyaltuves.com

I voted for Freddy Patek while I was there. I watched him play. Only one in that list that I know.

Random Garfield Comic Generator.

http://www.bgreco.net/garfield/

The Beav wrote:Random Garfield Comic Generator.

http://www.bgreco.net/garfield/

what would be totally awesome is if they DIDNT have one of these for Family Circus.

Heywood McCrakin wrote:

The Beav wrote:Random Garfield Comic Generator.

http://www.bgreco.net/garfield/

what would be totally awesome is if they DIDNT have one of these for Family Circle.

Family Circus?

middle aged female wrote:

Heywood McCrakin wrote:

The Beav wrote:Random Garfield Comic Generator.

http://www.bgreco.net/garfield/

what would be totally awesome is if they DIDNT have one of these for Family Circle.

Family Circus?

i said Family Circus...why did you change it.

: )

This got some chuckles the first couple pages.

http://tldrwikipedia.tumblr.com/

Brilliant!!

http://www.tylervigen.com/

I can just imagine the havoc someone could cause with some of these.
Here's an example...

http://www.tylervigen.com/view_correlation?id=1597

Amadeus wrote:Brilliant!!

http://www.tylervigen.com/

I can just imagine the havoc someone could cause with some of these.
Here's an example...

http://www.tylervigen.com/view_correlation?id=1597

Yeah, but how do you KNOW that these are "spurious," hmmm?

Have I shared my lottery story? The sales/Account guys came to me a while ago and asked for technique for predicting winning numbers in the mega-drawing games, reasoning that some numbers must be hot. It's true, some numbers will for a time appear more frequently on consecutive days than random selection would predict, but the trouble is that these deviations are small and by the time that you've noted an anomally it has probably passed. So, instead, I offered this: correlate sales of stock by the officers of public companies with high points in the value of said stock. Sales by officers is a matter of public record, as is daily close price of shares. By looking at a handful of companies with which I have some familiarity I was able to demonstrate that some insiders got it right more often than did others and sold at temporary highs. Leave aside conspiracy theories of stock price manipulation for a second and think about the implications: some officers of public companies are in effect canaries in the coal mine signalling the right time at which to sell. Wow. Trouble is, of course, that these sale data are not reported in real time, meaning that if you work for the FTC you might be interested, but as an investor looking for an angle the news comes way, way too late to be acted upon.